Xarelto MDL 2592 Important Developments

Xarelto MDL 2592

Important Developments in the Xarelto Litigation

There have been two important developments in the Xarelto Litigation, one in the Federal Litigation before Judge Eldon Fallon and the other in the Philadelphia court of Common Pleas before Judge Arnold New.

Deadline Set for Filing Bundled Claims In Xarelto MDL 2592

In Xarelto Litigation Federal MDL 2592, on March 21st, Judge Eldon Fallon issued Pretrial Order No. 11E.

PTO 11E sets a deadline for filing bundled complaints in MDL 2592 as well as filing Short Form Complaints. The deadline set by Judge Fallon is May 20th 2016.   This order does not prevent claims from being filed in MDL 2592 after May 20th however, for each complaint filed after May 20th the firm filing the complaint will need to pay the full filing fee for each claim filed and will no longer be able to file multiple claims for a single filing fee.

Firms filing after the May 20th deadline will also no longer be able to file a short from complaint. Complaints filed after May 20th must be filed in accordance with FRCP and Local Court  Rules.

This order will be in effect until such time as Judge Fallon may elect to amend the order. In that Judge Fallon has often expressed a displeasure with firms holding cases which are ripe for filing, preventing him from having a clear picture of the number of potential cases in the Universe of an MDL before him, it is unlikely that he will amend this order.

Deadline for Filing Short Form Complaints in Xarelto MDL 2592

Xarelto MDL 2592 PTO 11E also sets the same May 20th deadline for filing Short Form Complaints in the Xarelto MDL before Judge Fallon. After May 20th, attorneys filing cases in the MDL will be required to file “Long Form”, in the manner a case would be filed in the local Federal Court in the Easter District of Louisiana under any other circumstances.


Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Allows Efficacy Claims

In the State MDL before Judge Arnold New which is ongoing in the Phildelphia Court of Common Pleas, Judge New has elected to allow “Efficacy Claims” to be filed in that MDL in addition to claims related to uncontrolled bleeding. Judge Fallon has yet to follow suit and may not.

Efficacy claims are those that arise from blood clot related injuries, experienced by individuals while taking Xarelto. Arguably, Xarelto should have prevented these injuries from occurring. Plaintiff argues that due to Xarelto’s one time per day dosing, the anticoagulant intensity of Xarelto is depleted long before the patient consumes the next dose, leaving the patient exposed to the very injuries Xaretlo is intended to prevent. Plaintiffs content that the makers Xarelto designed its “one time per day” product simply to gain a marketing advantage over other multi time per day products it was competing against, primarily Pradaxa and Eliguis .


Subscribers to www.masstortnexus.com may access all documents related to the Xarelto Litigation MDL 2592 as well as the Xarelto Litigation ongoing in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Mass Tort Nexus Subscribers also have access to all forms, orders, documents and information related to all ongoing Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Product Liability Litigation’s in the Emerging Phase , Litigation as Phase well as the Settlement Phase.

John Ray

John Ray has been a leading consultant to the Mass Tort industry for over a decade. His unique skill sets make him well suited to both teaching and consulting in the Mass Tort arena. As a 21-year old graduate of Brenau University in Atlanta, John graduated Magna Cum Laude and started a pharmaceutical and medical device company right out of school, selling it in an eight-figure deal when he was 35. John’s tenure in the pharmaceutical and medical device field allowed him to gain an in-depth understanding of FDA regulatory matters, as well as, a thorough understanding of the science and epidemiology related to gaining FDA approval to market pharmaceuticals and medical devices. John’s inside knowledge of how “Big Pharma” operates gives him a unique perspective and skill sets that are very useful to Mass Tort plaintiff firms. When John brought his “insider knowledge” and business acumen to the Plaintiff Mass Tort Space, one of the first things he recognized was a lack of common terminology and well defined metrics. John realized that firms were expressing the same concepts, but were not using the same terminology. As a result, John set out to define common terms and create methods for formulating important metrics for use by Mass Tort firms when evaluating litigations. The terminology and metrics John Ray developed are now commonly used by major Mass Tort Law firms. John is highly sought after and writes White Papers about both current and emerging torts, which are highly coveted in the industry. The accuracy of John’s analysis of emerging and ongoing litigations is unmatched. The fact that John not an attorney has proven to be an asset. John thinks like a business person, employing creative problem solving and possesses an extensive set of business skills and industry specific knowledge. He assists Mass Tort firms in making sound business decisions before and during any litigation they are involved in or are considering becoming involved in. John is an expert at evaluating cases and looks at each tort as an individual “investment,” which can be quantified resulting in risk mitigation for you and your firm.

Leave a Reply